123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168 |
- /*
- * Copyright (c) 2013-2018, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.
- *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- */
- #include <assert.h>
- #include <string.h>
- #include <arch_helpers.h>
- #include <lib/bakery_lock.h>
- #include <lib/el3_runtime/cpu_data.h>
- #include <plat/common/platform.h>
- /*
- * Functions in this file implement Bakery Algorithm for mutual exclusion with the
- * bakery lock data structures in coherent memory.
- *
- * ARM architecture offers a family of exclusive access instructions to
- * efficiently implement mutual exclusion with hardware support. However, as
- * well as depending on external hardware, the these instructions have defined
- * behavior only on certain memory types (cacheable and Normal memory in
- * particular; see ARMv8 Architecture Reference Manual section B2.10). Use cases
- * in trusted firmware are such that mutual exclusion implementation cannot
- * expect that accesses to the lock have the specific type required by the
- * architecture for these primitives to function (for example, not all
- * contenders may have address translation enabled).
- *
- * This implementation does not use mutual exclusion primitives. It expects
- * memory regions where the locks reside to be fully ordered and coherent
- * (either by disabling address translation, or by assigning proper attributes
- * when translation is enabled).
- *
- * Note that the ARM architecture guarantees single-copy atomicity for aligned
- * accesses regardless of status of address translation.
- */
- #define assert_bakery_entry_valid(_entry, _bakery) do { \
- assert((_bakery) != NULL); \
- assert((_entry) < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS); \
- } while (false)
- /* Obtain a ticket for a given CPU */
- static unsigned int bakery_get_ticket(bakery_lock_t *bakery, unsigned int me)
- {
- unsigned int my_ticket, their_ticket;
- unsigned int they;
- /* Prevent recursive acquisition */
- assert(bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[me]) == 0U);
- /*
- * Flag that we're busy getting our ticket. All CPUs are iterated in the
- * order of their ordinal position to decide the maximum ticket value
- * observed so far. Our priority is set to be greater than the maximum
- * observed priority
- *
- * Note that it's possible that more than one contender gets the same
- * ticket value. That's OK as the lock is acquired based on the priority
- * value, not the ticket value alone.
- */
- my_ticket = 0U;
- bakery->lock_data[me] = make_bakery_data(CHOOSING_TICKET, my_ticket);
- for (they = 0U; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
- their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[they]);
- if (their_ticket > my_ticket)
- my_ticket = their_ticket;
- }
- /*
- * Compute ticket; then signal to other contenders waiting for us to
- * finish calculating our ticket value that we're done
- */
- ++my_ticket;
- bakery->lock_data[me] = make_bakery_data(CHOSEN_TICKET, my_ticket);
- return my_ticket;
- }
- /*
- * Acquire bakery lock
- *
- * Contending CPUs need first obtain a non-zero ticket and then calculate
- * priority value. A contending CPU iterate over all other CPUs in the platform,
- * which may be contending for the same lock, in the order of their ordinal
- * position (CPU0, CPU1 and so on). A non-contending CPU will have its ticket
- * (and priority) value as 0. The contending CPU compares its priority with that
- * of others'. The CPU with the highest priority (lowest numerical value)
- * acquires the lock
- */
- void bakery_lock_get(bakery_lock_t *bakery)
- {
- unsigned int they, me;
- unsigned int my_ticket, my_prio, their_ticket;
- unsigned int their_bakery_data;
- me = plat_my_core_pos();
- assert_bakery_entry_valid(me, bakery);
- /* Get a ticket */
- my_ticket = bakery_get_ticket(bakery, me);
- /*
- * Now that we got our ticket, compute our priority value, then compare
- * with that of others, and proceed to acquire the lock
- */
- my_prio = bakery_get_priority(my_ticket, me);
- for (they = 0U; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
- if (me == they)
- continue;
- /* Wait for the contender to get their ticket */
- do {
- their_bakery_data = bakery->lock_data[they];
- } while (bakery_is_choosing(their_bakery_data));
- /*
- * If the other party is a contender, they'll have non-zero
- * (valid) ticket value. If they do, compare priorities
- */
- their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(their_bakery_data);
- if ((their_ticket != 0U) &&
- (bakery_get_priority(their_ticket, they) < my_prio)) {
- /*
- * They have higher priority (lower value). Wait for
- * their ticket value to change (either release the lock
- * to have it dropped to 0; or drop and probably content
- * again for the same lock to have an even higher value)
- */
- do {
- wfe();
- } while (their_ticket ==
- bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[they]));
- }
- }
- /*
- * Lock acquired. Ensure that any reads and writes from a shared
- * resource in the critical section read/write values after the lock is
- * acquired.
- */
- dmbish();
- }
- /* Release the lock and signal contenders */
- void bakery_lock_release(bakery_lock_t *bakery)
- {
- unsigned int me = plat_my_core_pos();
- assert_bakery_entry_valid(me, bakery);
- assert(bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[me]) != 0U);
- /*
- * Ensure that other observers see any stores in the critical section
- * before releasing the lock. Also ensure all loads in the critical
- * section are complete before releasing the lock. Release the lock by
- * resetting ticket. Then signal other waiting contenders.
- */
- dmbish();
- bakery->lock_data[me] = 0U;
- /* Required to ensure ordering of the following sev */
- dsb();
- sev();
- }
|