123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156 |
- Dinit Design
- ============
- NOTE: This document is intended to provide an overview. Specifics are generally included as
- comments/documentation within source files.
- Design philosophy
- -----------------
- Software design always involves balancing different concerns. Important concerns considered during
- development of Dinit include:
- - Usability. The software should be easy to use and understand. Dangerous actions should be
- guarded (eg stopping a service via dinitctl requires a "--force" argument if it would also cause
- dependent services to stop). Common use cases should be supported by the feature set.
- Documentation should be complete. Error messages should be useful. Traceability/debugging is
- important.
- - Compatibility and interopability. The software should work together with other pre-existing
- software; it is a piece of a larger puzzle. New interfaces should only be created when they
- provide a tangible benefit (eg Dinit supports the same readiness protocol as S6, and works with
- legacy processes that fork after launching via the bgprocess service type. It logs via the
- standard syslog mechanism).
- - Scope. The feature set is restricted, but is large enough to provide utility and usability.
- - Generality. Arbitrary restrictions should be avoided. Size is kept small and memory use low to
- make Dinit usable on systems with limited resources. Code remains portable across different
- operating systems.
- - Maintainability. Code should be readable and well-documented; it should leverage the compiler's
- optimisations to remove abstraction penalty, wherever possible, so that the code can be more
- expressive, and comments should clearly explain why optimisations live "in the code" in cases
- where it is otherwise necessary.
- Of course, there are always trade-offs, but I believe that Dinit strikes a good balance with
- regard to the concerns listed above.
- Design fundamentals
- -------------------
- The design is based around an event loop: events include process termination, signal reception,
- and I/O coming in from control sockets (used to issue service start/stop commands etc via
- dinitctl). The Dasynq library provides the backend event loop functionality; it is included
- with the Dinit source, but has a separate web page and documentation:
- http://davmac.org/projects/dasynq/
- In Dinit, service actions are often performed by setting "propagation" flags, inserting the
- service in a queue, and then processing the queues. Thus a lot of service actions are performed
- by first calling a function on a service and then draining the propagation queues. More
- information can be found in comments at the beginning of the includes/service.h header.
- The logging subsystem is designed to log to two different sinks - typically, one is the console
- and one is the syslog facility, but other arrangements are possible. It uses a circular buffer
- for each output sink, and if the buffer becomes full it discards additional messages to avoid
- blocking (though it flags that this has occurred and later outputs a message to the sink).
- Services may acquire the console and in this case output is discarded (though it will of
- course continue to be logged to the other sink).
- Control protocol handling uses a circular receive buffer, but allocates storage for outgoing
- packets dynamically. If allocation fails an "out of memory" flag is set and the connection is
- closed after writing an "out of memory" information packet.
- Services
- --------
- There are presently four service types: internal, process, bgprocess and scripted. The latter
- three share the fact that they execute external processes and so naturally share some
- implementation. The base service class is "service_record" - this directly supports "internal"
- services. The "base_process_service" class extends this and serves as a base class for the other
- three service types (which all manage external processes) and provides common functionality.
- Various functions in the service_record / base_process_service classes are virtual, so that they
- can be overridden by the subclasses.
- All execution of child processes related to services currently goes through
- service_record::run_child_proc() (after forking).
- Services are grouped in a "service_set". This provides the essential interface between the event
- loop and services.
- Key considerations
- ------------------
- Dinit's overall function is fairly straightforward but there are some considerations that cause
- its design to be more complicated than it might otherwise be. The heart of the issue is that
- Dinit should not stall on I/O and its essential operation should never fail, which means that many
- code paths cannot perform memory allocation for example, and that log messages all go through a
- buffer.
- Note that blocking actions are avoided: non-blocking I/O is used where possible; Dinit must
- remain responsive at all times.
- In general operation Dinit methods should avoid throwing exceptions and be declared as 'noexcept',
- or otherwise be clearly documented as throwing exceptions. Errors should always be handled as
- gracefully as possible and should not prevent Dinit's continued operation. Particular care is
- needed for dynamic allocations: C++ style allocations (including adding elements to C++
- containers, or appending to strings) will raise 'std::bad_alloc' if they cannot allocate memory,
- and this must be handled appropriately. Once it has started regular operation, dinit must not
- terminate due to an error condition, even if the error is an allocation failure or another
- exception.
- Source code organisation
- ------------------------
- Most function comments and general documentation can be found in header files rather than in the
- corresponding source files.
- dinit-main.cc - just a wrapper around the entry point; reports exceptions
- dinit.cc - main entry point, command line parsing, general initialisation, event loop processing,
- signal handling, system management (shutdown / reboot etc)
- service.cc - base service logic (see service.h)
- proc-service.cc, baseproc-service.cc - process-based service logic (see service.h, proc-service.h)
- This builds on functionality in service.cc
-
- run-child-proc.cc - contains service_record::run_child_proc(), used to run child processes.
- load-service.cc - service loading (see load-service.h)
- control.cc - control protocol handling
- dinit-log.cc - logging subsystem
- dinit-env.cc - mainly a function to read an environment file into an "environment" wrapper (as
- defined in dinit-env.h)
- tests/ - various tests
- igr-tests/ - integration tests
- The utility sources are:
- dinitctl.cc - the control/status utility
- dinitcheck.cc - dinitcheck utility
- dinit-monitor.cc - the dinit-monitor utility
- shutdown.cc - shutdown/halt/reboot utility
- Testing
- -------
- The unit tests work by mocking out parts of Dinit, and some system calls, in order to isolate
- functional units. In the src/tests/test-includes directory are some mock headers. When compiling
- tests, these headers are put on the include path before the regular includes directory.
- Note that systems calls are not mocked directly, instead, system calls are wrapped in the bp_sys
- namespace, as defined in the baseproc-sys.h header; this header is one of the headers mocked
- for tests. (This avoids problems that might arise from replacing important system calls, and in
- particular avoids interfering with the test harness itself).
- It is important when writing new code in Dinit to avoid calling system calls directly, and to
- instead call the wrapper in bp_sys.
|