Currently any provider run-time activation requires the presence of the initialization parameters in the OpenSSL configuration file. Otherwise the provider will be activated with some default settings, that may or may not work for a particular application. For real-world systems it may require providing a specially designed OpenSSL configuration file and passing it somehow (e.g. via environment), which has obvious drawbacks.
We need a possibility to initialize providers on per-application level according to per-application parameters. It's necessary for example for PKCS#11 provider (where different applications may use different devices with different drivers) and will be useful for some other providers. In case of Red Hat it is also usable for FIPS provider.
OpenSSL 3.2 introduces the API
OSSL_PROVIDER *OSSL_PROVIDER_load_ex(OSSL_LIB_CTX *libctx, const char *name,
OSSL_PARAM params[]);
intended to configure the provider at load time.
It accepts only parameters of type OSSL_PARAM_UTF8_STRING
because any
provider can be initialized from the config file where the values are
represented as strings and provider init function has to deal with it.
Explicitly configured parameters can differ from the parameters named in the configuration file. Here are the current design decisions and some possible future steps.
Many applications use PKCS#11 API with specific drivers. OpenSSL PKCS#11 provider https://github.com/latchset/pkcs11-provider also provides a set of tweaks usable in particular situations. So there are several scenarios for which the new API can be used:
When the provider is already loaded an activated in the current library context,
the OSSL_PROVIDER_load_ex
call simply returns the active provider and the
extra parameters are ignored.
In all other cases, the extra parameters provided by the OSSL_PROVIDER_load_ex
call are applied and the values from the config file are ignored.
Separate instances of the provider can be loaded in the separate library contexts.
Several instances of the same provider can be loaded in the same context using
different section names, module names (e.g. via symlinks) and provider names.
But unless the provider supports some configuration options, the algorithms in
this case will have the same provider
property and the result of fetching is
not determined. We strongly discourage against this trick.
Changing the loaded provider configuration at runtime is not supported. If
it is necessary, the provider needs to be unloaded using OSSL_PROVIDER_unload
and reloaded using OSSL_PROVIDER_load
or OSSL_PROVIDER_load_ex
should be used.
We should provide some API function accessing the configuration parameters of a particular provider. Having it, the application will be able to combine some default values with the app-specific ones in more or less intellectual way.
We probably should remove the INFOPAIR
structure and use the OSSL_PARAM
one instead.