PROBLEMS 5.3 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131
  1. * System libcrypto.dylib and libssl.dylib are used by system ld on MacOS X.
  2. NOTE: The problem described here only applies when OpenSSL isn't built
  3. with shared library support (i.e. without the "shared" configuration
  4. option). If you build with shared library support, you will have no
  5. problems as long as you set up DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH properly at all times.
  6. This is really a misfeature in ld, which seems to look for .dylib libraries
  7. along the whole library path before it bothers looking for .a libraries. This
  8. means that -L switches won't matter unless OpenSSL is built with shared
  9. library support.
  10. The workaround may be to change the following lines in apps/Makefile and
  11. test/Makefile:
  12. LIBCRYPTO=-L.. -lcrypto
  13. LIBSSL=-L.. -lssl
  14. to:
  15. LIBCRYPTO=../libcrypto.a
  16. LIBSSL=../libssl.a
  17. It's possible that something similar is needed for shared library support
  18. as well. That hasn't been well tested yet.
  19. Another solution that many seem to recommend is to move the libraries
  20. /usr/lib/libcrypto.0.9.dylib, /usr/lib/libssl.0.9.dylib to a different
  21. directory, build and install OpenSSL and anything that depends on your
  22. build, then move libcrypto.0.9.dylib and libssl.0.9.dylib back to their
  23. original places. Note that the version numbers on those two libraries
  24. may differ on your machine.
  25. As long as Apple doesn't fix the problem with ld, this problem building
  26. OpenSSL will remain as is.
  27. * Parallell make leads to errors
  28. While running tests, running a parallell make is a bad idea. Many test
  29. scripts use the same name for output and input files, which means different
  30. will interfere with each other and lead to test failure.
  31. The solution is simple for now: don't run parallell make when testing.
  32. * Bugs in gcc 3.0 triggered
  33. According to a problem report, there are bugs in gcc 3.0 that are
  34. triggered by some of the code in OpenSSL, more specifically in
  35. PEM_get_EVP_CIPHER_INFO(). The triggering code is the following:
  36. header+=11;
  37. if (*header != '4') return(0); header++;
  38. if (*header != ',') return(0); header++;
  39. What happens is that gcc might optimize a little too agressively, and
  40. you end up with an extra incrementation when *header != '4'.
  41. We recommend that you upgrade gcc to as high a 3.x version as you can.
  42. * solaris64-sparcv9-cc SHA-1 performance with WorkShop 6 compiler.
  43. As subject suggests SHA-1 might perform poorly (4 times slower)
  44. if compiled with WorkShop 6 compiler and -xarch=v9. The cause for
  45. this seems to be the fact that compiler emits multiplication to
  46. perform shift operations:-( To work the problem around configure
  47. with './Configure solaris64-sparcv9-cc -DMD32_REG_T=int'.
  48. * Problems with hp-parisc2-cc target when used with "no-asm" flag
  49. When using the hp-parisc2-cc target, wrong bignum code is generated.
  50. This is due to the SIXTY_FOUR_BIT build being compiled with the +O3
  51. aggressive optimization.
  52. The problem manifests itself by the BN_kronecker test hanging in an
  53. endless loop. Reason: the BN_kronecker test calls BN_generate_prime()
  54. which itself hangs. The reason could be tracked down to the bn_mul_comba8()
  55. function in bn_asm.c. At some occasions the higher 32bit value of r[7]
  56. is off by 1 (meaning: calculated=shouldbe+1). Further analysis failed,
  57. as no debugger support possible at +O3 and additional fprintf()'s
  58. introduced fixed the bug, therefore it is most likely a bug in the
  59. optimizer.
  60. The bug was found in the BN_kronecker test but may also lead to
  61. failures in other parts of the code.
  62. (See Ticket #426.)
  63. Workaround: modify the target to +O2 when building with no-asm.
  64. * Poor support for AIX shared builds.
  65. do_aix-shared rule is not flexible enough to parameterize through a
  66. config-line. './Configure aix43-cc shared' is working, but not
  67. './Configure aix64-gcc shared'. In latter case make fails to create shared
  68. libraries. It's possible to build 64-bit shared libraries by running
  69. 'env OBJECT_MODE=64 make', but we need more elegant solution. Preferably one
  70. supporting even gcc shared builds. See RT#463 for background information.
  71. * Problems building shared libraries on SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.6
  72. with gcc 2.95.3
  73. The symptoms appear when running the test suite, more specifically
  74. test/ectest, with the following result:
  75. OSSL_LIBPATH="`cd ..; pwd`"; LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"; DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH"; SHLIB_PATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$SHLIB_PATH"; LIBPATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$LIBPATH"; if [ "debug-sco5-gcc" = "Cygwin" ]; then PATH="${LIBPATH}:$PATH"; fi; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH SHLIB_PATH LIBPATH PATH; ./ectest
  76. ectest.c:186: ABORT
  77. The cause of the problem seems to be that isxdigit(), called from
  78. BN_hex2bn(), returns 0 on a perfectly legitimate hex digit. Further
  79. investigation shows that any of the isxxx() macros return 0 on any
  80. input. A direct look in the information array that the isxxx() use,
  81. called __ctype, shows that it contains all zeroes...
  82. Taking a look at the newly created libcrypto.so with nm, one can see
  83. that the variable __ctype is defined in libcrypto's .bss (which
  84. explains why it is filled with zeroes):
  85. $ nm -Pg libcrypto.so | grep __ctype
  86. __ctype B 0011659c
  87. __ctype2 U
  88. Curiously, __ctype2 is undefined, in spite of being declared in
  89. /usr/include/ctype.h in exactly the same way as __ctype.
  90. Any information helping to solve this issue would be deeply
  91. appreciated.
  92. NOTE: building non-shared doesn't come with this problem.