Lutz Jänicke
4c1a6e004a
Apply mingw patches as supplied by Roumen Petrov an Alon Bar-Lev
|
16 years ago | |
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| asm | 17 years ago | |
| .cvsignore | 16 years ago | |
| Makefile | 17 years ago | |
| README | 26 years ago | |
| ripemd.h | 18 years ago | |
| rmd160.c | 22 years ago | |
| rmd_dgst.c | 18 years ago | |
| rmd_locl.h | 18 years ago | |
| rmd_one.c | 19 years ago | |
| rmdconst.h | 26 years ago | |
| rmdtest.c | 17 years ago | |
README
RIPEMD-160
http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html
This is my implementation of RIPEMD-160. The pentium assember is a little
off the pace since I only get 1050 cycles, while the best is 1013.
I have a few ideas for how to get another 20 or so cycles, but at
this point I will not bother right now. I belive the trick will be
to remove my 'copy X array onto stack' until inside the RIP1() finctions the
first time round. To do this I need another register and will only have one
temporary one. A bit tricky.... I can also cleanup the saving of the 5 words
after the first half of the calculation. I should read the origional
value, add then write. Currently I just save the new and read the origioal.
I then read both at the end. Bad.
eric (20-Jan-1998)
http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html
This is my implementation of RIPEMD-160. The pentium assember is a little
off the pace since I only get 1050 cycles, while the best is 1013.
I have a few ideas for how to get another 20 or so cycles, but at
this point I will not bother right now. I belive the trick will be
to remove my 'copy X array onto stack' until inside the RIP1() finctions the
first time round. To do this I need another register and will only have one
temporary one. A bit tricky.... I can also cleanup the saving of the 5 words
after the first half of the calculation. I should read the origional
value, add then write. Currently I just save the new and read the origioal.
I then read both at the end. Bad.
eric (20-Jan-1998)