/* vim: set expandtab ts=4 sw=4: */ /* * You may redistribute this program and/or modify it under the terms of * the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, * either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program. If not, see . */ #ifndef Version_H #define Version_H #include "util/Linker.h" Linker_require("util/version/Version.c") #include /* * Cjdns Protocol Versions * * The first argument to Version_COMPAT is the new version, the second argument is a list of * older versions with which it is compatible. All versions are obviously assumed to be compatible * with themselves and any version which is compatible with the most recent version to date is * assumed to be compatible with all future versions. */ #ifndef Version_COMPAT // defined otherwise in Version.c #define Version_COMPAT(one, twoRange) #endif /* * Version 0: * January 2012 * * First version. */ Version_COMPAT(0, ([])) /* * Version 1: * October 2012 * * When you send someone a message through cjdns, it's encrypted. * When you send the first message to a router, it has a nice header on it which tells them your key * and allows them to establish a cryptographic session with you. For every message after that, they * need to remember that session and use it to decrypt the message. * * The way they remember which session a message is associated with is to look at the switching * label from that message and compare that with the label which was used when the first message was * sent (with the header). * * What I didn't think about at the time is that labels change. Nodes find a better path to a * destination and expect the same session to work. It would work if the other end knew which * session to use but it can't know, the label is different. * * This is a protocol bug. * * In my opinion, the best way to fix it is to send an additional header before the crypto nonce * which tells the foreign node who it came from. When the handshake message is sent, the node will * send a 4 byte integer which the other end will store. Every time the other end sends a * non-handshake message to this end, it will prepend that same integer to the encrypted message and * on recieving a message, a node will use that number to do a lookup of the correct session to use. * The number can be a pointer or index offset so this can be quite fast. * Integer 0xFFFFFFFF shall be reserved and handshake messages which contain this value must be * ignored or treated as protocol 0 messages. * * But this is a protocol break. * * If a node gets handed a number and doesn't know what to do with it, it will think it's a * CryptoAuth header and it will fail. New nodes would be able to try a message as the old form if * the new form doesn't work but old nodes will just fail if they are ever sent a message in the new * form. * * Proposed Solution: * A key will be sent in all findNodes responses in the router, this key will be "np" for nodes' * protocol (version). * It will contain a string representation of a list of the protocol version numbers for the nodes * which it is introducing. The numbers will all be the same number of bytes and the first byte will * give that number. The length of the string will always be equal to one, plus the number of nodes * times the value of the first byte. * * This example shows the p which would accompany a findNodes response containing 1 node with * protocol version zero and one node with protocol version 1. * * "np": "\x01\x00\x01" * * 2:np3:\x01\x00\x01 * * This example shows the p which would accompany a findNodes response containing 1 node with * protocol version 300 and two nodes with protocol version 5. * * "np": "\x02\x01\x2c\x00\x05\x00\x05" * * 2:np7:\x02\x01\x2c\x00\x05\x00\x05 * * All multi-byte numbers shall be encoded in big endian encoding. * * Each node will have an internal compatibility matrix giving protocol version numbers which * can communicate, a node shall not respond to a findNodes message with a response containing any * nodes which are known to be incompatible with the protocol version of the requesting node. * Versions which are beyond the highest version number in the compatability matrix will be assumed * to have the same compatability as the highest number in the table. * * All messages shall contain shall contain an "p" key as well but these will have a benc integer * representing the protocol version of the sending node. * * Change to the Ping switch control message: * New switch ping messages will all be 8 or more bytes long, they will begin with a magic field * and then a version number which is the version of the sending node. * The magic will be set to 0x09f91102 for all ping messages and to 0x9d74e35b in the response * messages (these numbers shall be big endian encoded). Following this number will be a 4 byte * field containing the protocol version. Nodes which only speak protocol version 0 will be * identifyable because they echo back 0x09f91102 rather than replacing it and they will be unlikely * to send a ping request whose content begins with 0x09f91102. * * Protocol1.1 * In protocol0 there was a single pool of sessions shared between the outer and inner layer. * In protocol1 it was split because one pool needed to have handles and the other pool didn't. * The problem with this is communications do not necessarily travel back and forth along the * same path and protocol1 exhibited a pathology wherein one node was direct sending packets to * another while the other was routing the responses via an intermediary. * There were 2 CryptoAuth sessions between the two nodes and neither session was entering run * state. So protocol1 was broken and the new protocol1 (protocol1.1) sends session handles on top * of the CryptoAuth handshake headers even if the handshake is in the inner layer (under the Ipv6 * header). It does not however send handles in the inner layer when the inner layer CryptoAuth * session is in HANDSHAKE3 state or above. * Protocol1.1 still identifies itself as Protocol1, it will not be able to communicate with * protocol0 in some circumstances. If it knows nothing about the other node and it forwards a * message via an intermediary, the message will be unreadable at the other end. * * Protocol1.2 * Changes in protocol1.1 are reverted as a solution was found in the implementation. */ Version_COMPAT(1, ([0])) /* * Version 2: * February 21, 2013 * * Remove compatibility layer for communicating with version 0 nodes. */ Version_COMPAT(2, ([1])) /* * Version 3: * August 16, 2013 * * In version 1, handles were introduced so that a session could be looked when a packet came in. * During the initiation of a session, the node's handle was placed before the CryptoAuth block * unless the message was a layer-3 (forwarded) message in which case it was at the beginning * inside of the innermost CryptoAuth block. This handle was transferred to the peer so they could * tell how *this* node identifies the session. * * When a layer-2 (non-forwarded) message was received which was *not* a session initiation packet, * the peer's handle was placed before the CryptoAuth block in order for the peer to be able to * lookup the session in their table. * * Unfortunately the handle outside of the CryptoAuth initiation block was not authenticated in any * way and a switch could alter it accidently or maliciously causing the wrong session identifier * to be stored leading to the session failing until it eventually times out. * * To fix this bug the handle attached to the initiation message has been moved into the CryptoAuth * block where it should have been in the first place. Obviously the peer's handle is still placed * outside of the CryptoAuth block so it can serve it's function. * * As of version 3, implementations must not send handles which are less than 4 so that when they * receive them back, they will not be confused with the initial 4 bytes of a CryptoAuth setup * packet which is not preceeded by a handle. */ Version_COMPAT(3, ([1,2])) /* * Version 4: * August 27, 2013 * * This version makes no protocol changes but fixes a nasty bug with forwarding which caused * messages to be forwarded to random nodes, updated to encourage nodes to forward via others * who do not have the bug. */ Version_COMPAT(4, ([1,2,3])) /* * Version 5: * September 4, 2013 * * This version introduces a new RPC call for getting directly connected peers from a node. * The new RPC call is called "gp" and it takes a target label called "tar" which must be an * 8 byte long benc string. It returns a list of peers exactly the same as a search but they * must all be direct peers and they are the peers whose labels have smallest XOR distance * from "tar". */ Version_COMPAT(5, ([1,2,3,4])) /* * Version 6: * December 14, 2013 * * Drop support for versions older than 5 */ Version_COMPAT(6, ([5])) /* * Version 7: * March 16, 2014 * * A ceremonial version which has the pathfinder2 implemented. * this is still compatible with the same versions and doesn't expressly change the protocol * although it is nolonger able to communicate with *older* version 5 nodes which do not advertize * their encoding scheme. */ Version_COMPAT(7, ([5,6])) /** * The current protocol version. */ #define Version_CURRENT_PROTOCOL 7 #define Version_5_COMPAT #define Version_6_COMPAT #define Version_MINIMUM_COMPATIBLE 5 #define Version_DEFAULT_ASSUMPTION 5 /** * Check the compatibility matrix and return whether two versions are compatible. * If a version is not listed on the table, the highest version on the table is * substituted for it but if the return value is yes, it is changed to maybe. * * @param version1 the first version * @param version2 the second version * @return 1 meaning compatible or 0 meaning incompatible. */ int Version_isCompatible(uint32_t one, uint32_t two); #endif