123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 |
- From: =?utf-8?q?Guido_G=C3=BCnther?= <agx@sigxcpu.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:02:03 +0200
- Subject: CVE-2017-12163: s3:smbd: Prevent client short SMB1 write from
- writing server memory to file.
- BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13020
- Author: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
- Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
- Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
- ---
- source3/smbd/reply.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
- --- a/source3/smbd/reply.c
- +++ b/source3/smbd/reply.c
- @@ -3979,6 +3979,9 @@ void reply_writebraw(struct smb_request
- }
-
- /* Ensure we don't write bytes past the end of this packet. */
- + /*
- + * This already protects us against CVE-2017-12163.
- + */
- if (data + numtowrite > smb_base(req->inbuf) + smb_len(req->inbuf)) {
- reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- error_to_writebrawerr(req);
- @@ -4080,6 +4083,11 @@ void reply_writebraw(struct smb_request
- exit_server_cleanly("secondary writebraw failed");
- }
-
- + /*
- + * We are not vulnerable to CVE-2017-12163
- + * here as we are guarenteed to have numtowrite
- + * bytes available - we just read from the client.
- + */
- nwritten = write_file(req,fsp,buf+4,startpos+nwritten,numtowrite);
- if (nwritten == -1) {
- TALLOC_FREE(buf);
- @@ -4161,6 +4169,7 @@ void reply_writeunlock(struct smb_reques
- connection_struct *conn = req->conn;
- ssize_t nwritten = -1;
- size_t numtowrite;
- + size_t remaining;
- SMB_OFF_T startpos;
- const char *data;
- NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK;
- @@ -4193,6 +4202,17 @@ void reply_writeunlock(struct smb_reques
- startpos = IVAL_TO_SMB_OFF_T(req->vwv+2, 0);
- data = (const char *)req->buf + 3;
-
- + /*
- + * Ensure client isn't asking us to write more than
- + * they sent. CVE-2017-12163.
- + */
- + remaining = smbreq_bufrem(req, data);
- + if (numtowrite > remaining) {
- + reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- + END_PROFILE(SMBwriteunlock);
- + return;
- + }
- +
- if (!fsp->print_file && numtowrite > 0) {
- init_strict_lock_struct(fsp, (uint64_t)req->smbpid,
- (uint64_t)startpos, (uint64_t)numtowrite, WRITE_LOCK,
- @@ -4274,6 +4294,7 @@ void reply_write(struct smb_request *req
- {
- connection_struct *conn = req->conn;
- size_t numtowrite;
- + size_t remaining;
- ssize_t nwritten = -1;
- SMB_OFF_T startpos;
- const char *data;
- @@ -4314,6 +4335,17 @@ void reply_write(struct smb_request *req
- startpos = IVAL_TO_SMB_OFF_T(req->vwv+2, 0);
- data = (const char *)req->buf + 3;
-
- + /*
- + * Ensure client isn't asking us to write more than
- + * they sent. CVE-2017-12163.
- + */
- + remaining = smbreq_bufrem(req, data);
- + if (numtowrite > remaining) {
- + reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- + END_PROFILE(SMBwrite);
- + return;
- + }
- +
- if (!fsp->print_file) {
- init_strict_lock_struct(fsp, (uint64_t)req->smbpid,
- (uint64_t)startpos, (uint64_t)numtowrite, WRITE_LOCK,
- @@ -4525,6 +4557,9 @@ void reply_write_and_X(struct smb_reques
- return;
- }
- } else {
- + /*
- + * This already protects us against CVE-2017-12163.
- + */
- if (smb_doff > smblen || smb_doff + numtowrite < numtowrite ||
- smb_doff + numtowrite > smblen) {
- reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- @@ -4894,6 +4929,7 @@ void reply_writeclose(struct smb_request
- {
- connection_struct *conn = req->conn;
- size_t numtowrite;
- + size_t remaining;
- ssize_t nwritten = -1;
- NTSTATUS close_status = NT_STATUS_OK;
- SMB_OFF_T startpos;
- @@ -4927,6 +4963,17 @@ void reply_writeclose(struct smb_request
- mtime = convert_time_t_to_timespec(srv_make_unix_date3(req->vwv+4));
- data = (const char *)req->buf + 1;
-
- + /*
- + * Ensure client isn't asking us to write more than
- + * they sent. CVE-2017-12163.
- + */
- + remaining = smbreq_bufrem(req, data);
- + if (numtowrite > remaining) {
- + reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- + END_PROFILE(SMBwriteclose);
- + return;
- + }
- +
- if (!fsp->print_file) {
- init_strict_lock_struct(fsp, (uint64_t)req->smbpid,
- (uint64_t)startpos, (uint64_t)numtowrite, WRITE_LOCK,
- @@ -5497,6 +5544,9 @@ void reply_printwrite(struct smb_request
-
- numtowrite = SVAL(req->buf, 1);
-
- + /*
- + * This already protects us against CVE-2017-12163.
- + */
- if (req->buflen < numtowrite + 3) {
- reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- END_PROFILE(SMBsplwr);
|