From 0ff035231edca3713c3d0839c44e64a4ac41ef38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:09:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] leds: trigger: netdev: fix handling on interface rename

The NETDEV_CHANGENAME code is not "unneeded" like it is stated in commit
4cb6560514fa ("leds: trigger: netdev: fix refcnt leak on interface
rename").

The event was accidentally misinterpreted equivalent to
NETDEV_UNREGISTER, but should be equivalent to NETDEV_REGISTER.

This was the case in the original code from the openwrt project.

Otherwise, you are unable to set netdev led triggers for (non-existent)
netdevices, which has to be renamed. This is the case, for example, for
ppp interfaces in openwrt.

Fixes: 06f502f57d0d ("leds: trigger: Introduce a NETDEV trigger")
Fixes: 4cb6560514fa ("leds: trigger: netdev: fix refcnt leak on interface rename")
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
---
 drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
@@ -299,10 +299,12 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct not
 							    notifier);
 
 	if (evt != NETDEV_UP && evt != NETDEV_DOWN && evt != NETDEV_CHANGE
-	    && evt != NETDEV_REGISTER && evt != NETDEV_UNREGISTER)
+	    && evt != NETDEV_REGISTER && evt != NETDEV_UNREGISTER
+	    && evt != NETDEV_CHANGENAME)
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	if (!(dev == trigger_data->net_dev ||
+	      (evt == NETDEV_CHANGENAME && !strcmp(dev->name, trigger_data->device_name)) ||
 	      (evt == NETDEV_REGISTER && !strcmp(dev->name, trigger_data->device_name))))
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
@@ -312,6 +314,7 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct not
 
 	clear_bit(NETDEV_LED_MODE_LINKUP, &trigger_data->mode);
 	switch (evt) {
+	case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
 	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
 		if (trigger_data->net_dev)
 			dev_put(trigger_data->net_dev);
